Re: [boost] Vault: still needed?

Subject: Re: [boost] Vault: still needed?
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-23 01:03:52

on Thu Jan 22 2009, "vicente.botet" <vicente.botet-AT-wanadoo.fr> wrote:

> Hi,
> I think that most of the libraries that you find in the sandbox do not include the
> html documentation, while the compressed files in the Vault include them. I see
> authors that store several versions of its libraries. If Boost.Vault have problems
> with the space we should preserv the last version of each library and remove the old
> ones.

Well, frankly I don't love the idea that the vault's php code is running
on our server at all; I don't trust it all that much, and I don't think
we're spending any resources on backing that data up.  I think
Subversion is a much more reliable way to do this, and as a bonus the
revisions will all be trackable.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com