Subject: Re: [boost] Vault: still needed?
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-23 16:05:16
Edward Diener wrote:
> Emil Dotchevski wrote:
>> The Boost Vault is similarly simpler than a giant SVN tree (I suppose
>> the word "inadequate" was a bit excessive.)
> One can place anything under SVN, including entire implementations in
> compressed file format, in any branch of SVN. Why not simply have a
> "Vault" branch of Boost's SVN and then have everyone who is used to
> using the Boost Vault place there software there. The end user could
> then use the "Vault" branch of Boost's SVN to get at it, and this would
> not impact other users of Boost's SVN from getting the latest Boost from
> the "trunk" in any way whatsoever.
I agree with this proposal. I think a "Vault" directory in SVN (maybe,
inside the sandbox repository) is a good idea. However, I'd like the
major advantage of the Vault to be preserved - this directory should be
accessible without having SVN installed. I would suggest to switch the
"Vault" reference in the web site to the appropriate page of web-SVN. At
least until people get accustomed with the idea that it is now in the
As a side question, what will happen with the current Vault contents?
Will it move under SVN or should the file owners move it themselves?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk