Subject: Re: [boost] [parameter] function types as named template parameters?
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-23 12:39:44
on Fri Jan 23 2009, Frank Mori Hess <frank.hess-AT-nist.gov> wrote:
>> Can you post a minimal example that reproduces this bug? I'm sure
>> there's a quick fix.
> Here you go. If you undefine NAMED_SIGNATURE_PARAMETER, the test works.
> Otherwise, it fails to compile (I'm using gcc 4.1.2).
This can't really be minimal, can it? Can you reduce it any further?
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk