Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [parameter] function types as named template parameters?
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-23 12:39:44

on Fri Jan 23 2009, Frank Mori Hess <> wrote:

>> Can you post a minimal example that reproduces this bug? I'm sure
>> there's a quick fix.
> Here you go. If you undefine NAMED_SIGNATURE_PARAMETER, the test works.
> Otherwise, it fails to compile (I'm using gcc 4.1.2).


This can't really be minimal, can it? Can you reduce it any further?

Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at