Re: [boost] [parameter] function types as named template parameters?

Subject: Re: [boost] [parameter] function types as named template parameters?
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-23 12:39:44

on Fri Jan 23 2009, Frank Mori Hess <frank.hess-AT-nist.gov> wrote:

>> Can you post a minimal example that reproduces this bug?  I'm sure
>> there's a quick fix.
>>
>
> Here you go.  If you undefine NAMED_SIGNATURE_PARAMETER, the test works.  
> Otherwise, it fails to compile (I'm using gcc 4.1.2).

<schnipp>

This can't really be minimal, can it?  Can you reduce it any further?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com