|
|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Proposal/InterestCheck: Boost.Geom
From: Anis Benyelloul (anis.benyelloul_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-30 10:52:41
Barend Gehrels <barend <at> geodan.nl> writes:
> It is probably possible to add such an approach on top of a library like
> ours.
I was just about to say the same thing about implementing `data-type
independent'-algorithms on top of my proposal.
All in all, I think the two approaches are orthogonal and solve two different
problems (make user's code independent of the underlying geometry framework vs
making algorithms applicable to any type the user is working with)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk