Subject: Re: [boost] Review process question
From: Henrik Sundberg (storangen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-02 02:51:54
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:06 AM, vicente.botet <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> The library under review needs to be a fixed one, stored in a compressed file in the Vault or elsewhere.
Using subversion there is still no need to do anything special with
the code to be reviewed. It is enough to specify which revision that
is to be reviewed. Tagging this revision is a good idea, but not
necessary. It is easier to keep up to date with changes, and to see
what has been changed, if the trunk is used.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk