Subject: Re: [boost] SCons script for building Boost
From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-02 17:57:01
Sergey Popov wrote:
> I've searched the ML archive and found out that scons wasn't considered for
> adoption because nobody offered to reimplement boost build instructions
> in terms of SCons.
Out of curiosity: As I have complained frequently and loudly to Scons
developers about the lack of correct dependency checks (especially when
figuring out the exact header inclusions requires a full preprocessor,
as is the case for boost's MPL !), I wonder whether this is now fixed
with recent SCons releases.
-- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...