Re: [boost] Coverity Static Code Analysis

Subject: Re: [boost] Coverity Static Code Analysis
From: Michael Fawcett (michael.fawcett_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-03 17:57:34

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Gennaro Prota <gennaro.prota_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Because there's already enough nonsense to show off on the
> site's corners? :-)

Do you mean Coverity's or Boost's site?  I'm not familiar with
Coverity at all.  If you meant Coverity, is it consensus that it's
nonsense?

--Michael Fawcett