Subject: Re: [boost] Coverity Static Code Analysis
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-04 01:24:27
Michael Fawcett wrote:
> Purely out of curiosity, how come Boost isn't at Rung 1 in the
> Coverity Scan Ladder?
> Boost and Boost.Build are both listed in Rung 0, so it appears that
> the only step left is selecting a Boost/Coverity liaison.
I have substantial doubts that they secretly implemented parser and analyser for
Boost.Jam language, and therefore scanning Boost.Build is likely useless.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk