Re: [boost] Coverity Static Code Analysis

Subject: Re: [boost] Coverity Static Code Analysis
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-04 01:24:27

Michael Fawcett wrote:

> Purely out of curiosity, how come Boost isn't at Rung 1 in the
> Coverity Scan Ladder?
> 
> http://scan.coverity.com/
> 
> Boost and Boost.Build are both listed in Rung 0, so it appears that
> the only step left is selecting a Boost/Coverity liaison.
> 
> http://scan.coverity.com/newproj.html

I have substantial doubts that they secretly implemented parser and analyser for
Boost.Jam language, and therefore scanning Boost.Build is likely useless.

- Volodya