Subject: Re: [boost] [1.38.0] branches/release frozen
From: Henrik Sundberg (storangen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-07 08:05:14
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Daniel James <daniel_james_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I don't think it's worth mentioning warning removals, if we go into
> that level of detail the interesting changes will get lost in the
Removal of warnings is important to me. I would upgrade to a new Boost
release for this reason alone.
> Minor changes should be expected. That said, I don't think
> we have a clear policy on this.
Yes, minor changes should be expected. But if I don't no about them, I
don't get that extra info when debugging own code.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk