Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [1.38.0] branches/release frozen
From: Daniel James (daniel_james_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-07 09:13:31

2009/2/7 Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>:
> As a side note, some projects out there employ dual change list. The one
> that goes into the News page enlists only major changes and a link to the
> second one with more detailed description. The latter one is often compiled
> from particular tickets that were solved in this release.
> I'm not suggesting to do the same in this release, but this looks like a
> good practice to follow in future to me.

It's a good idea, but we don't tend to create tickets for every issue.
So this couldn't be done automatically from the tickets at the moment.
We also have a culture of being very flexible about how libraries are
maintained, these things are largely up to the library maintainers.
Understandably, this often frustrates users who'd like a bit more


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at