Subject: Re: [boost] _SECURE_SCL for msvc
From: Jean-Francois Bastien (jfbastien_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-10 14:00:44
> the problem with _SECURE_SCL define was already discussed a
> few times on
> this list. But til now it came never to a end.
> Is there any interrest to get also compiled libraries for
> _SECURE_SCL enabled and _SECURE_SCL disabled? I think this
> would be really important because this compiler switch
> changes the abi and for that programs can crash.
> I think that a lot of people disable it already in their own
> programs, but may be they don't compile the boost libraries
> with this switch...
> Any comments?
IMHO _SECURE_SCL should participate in the library name mangling.
I collected the previous discussions on this a few months ago:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk