Subject: Re: [boost] _SECURE_SCL for msvc
From: Hansi (hansipet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-10 16:03:28
Jean-Francois Bastien schrieb:
> IMHO _SECURE_SCL should participate in the library name mangling.
> I collected the previous discussions on this a few months ago:
I think also that it is important that it is inside the name! Really
important to avoid any bugs!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk