Subject: Re: [boost] Review Request: Introduction of boost::string namespace and string-conversion functions
From: Ilya Sokolov (ilyasokol_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-13 07:02:29
> Bo Persson also expressed a concern siting it'll make it "very hard to
> propose the utilities for inclusion in a future language standard". May
> be. May be not. When things of that magnitude happen (which seem quite
> remote at present)
Using boost::string makes inclusion in std even more distant, while
choosing another name is trivial.
> components get moved from a namespace to a namespace
> (several times) anyway. Like some stuff from the "boost" namespace moving
> to the "tr1" namespace just ultimately to be moved to the "std" namespace.
In most cases names does not change when moved to std::.
The name 'boost::string' would suggest a string class for me, not a
namespace. boost::strings, boost::text,
boost::from_string/boost::to_string seems much better to me.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk