Subject: Re: [boost] [move] Library uploaded to sandbox
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-18 01:47:10
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ion Gaztañaga" <igaztanaga_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 11:00 PM
Subject: [boost] [move] Library uploaded to sandbox
> Hi to all,
> The library needs specially modified Interprocess containers (and
> Intrusive because of dependences), which I've also uploaded to sandbox.
> The examples show how movable only values can be inserted into containers.
I think this needs a clarification. The MoveEmulation library do not depends neither on Boost.Interprocess not on Boost.Intrusive. Isnt't it?
> I've invested some precious time in the library and testing different
> approaches to see if it plays well with containers but I would like to
> hear some comments on whether the direction is acceptable and if I
> should spend more time on it. If someone else with more time wants to
> continue the library, please do it! ;-)
I appreciate the good work you have done. Thanks Ion.
> I've personally added to the library all that I've seen useful for
> move-aware containers, so it might lack some features (move aware
> algorithms, for example).
Now that you have already tested with your InterProcess and Intrusive containers I'll adapt my own libraries to use it and see how it works.
> Anyway, my opinion is that we need some move library, better now than
> later even if it's too basic, so that we can unify all redundant move
> emulation that we already have in boost libraries. I hope this is a step
> in the right direction.
I completly agree. What about requesting a formal review?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk