Subject: Re: [boost] [move] Library uploaded to sandbox
From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-18 12:12:17
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ion Gaztañaga" <igaztanaga_at_[hidden]>
> To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 11:00 PM
> Subject: [boost] [move] Library uploaded to sandbox
>> Hi to all,
>> The library needs specially modified Interprocess containers (and
>> Intrusive because of dependences), which I've also uploaded to sandbox.
>> The examples show how movable only values can be inserted into containers.
> I think this needs a clarification. The MoveEmulation library do not depends neither on Boost.Interprocess not on Boost.Intrusive. Isnt't it?
No, there are no dependencies, but if you have a back_move_inserter, you
need a container that has move-capabilities. I adapted Interprocess ones
to test the Move library.
> I completly agree. What about requesting a formal review?
If there is some consensus, no problem. But I really want to avoid long
and time-consuming review (and boost reviews require a very big effort,
just see the ratio of announced/accepted libraries ;-) ), because my
time is quite limited right now. That's why I wanted to get some serious
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk