Re: [boost] [move] Library uploaded to sandbox

Subject: Re: [boost] [move] Library uploaded to sandbox
From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-18 12:12:17

vicente.botet wrote:
> Hi,
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Ion Gaztañaga" <igaztanaga_at_[hidden]>
> To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 11:00 PM
> Subject: [boost] [move] Library uploaded to sandbox
> 
> 
>> Hi to all,
>>
> <snip>
>  
>> The library needs specially modified Interprocess containers (and 
>> Intrusive because of dependences), which I've also uploaded to sandbox. 
>> The examples show how movable only values can be inserted into containers.
> 
> I think this needs a clarification. The MoveEmulation library do not depends neither on Boost.Interprocess not on Boost.Intrusive. Isnt't it?

No, there are no dependencies, but if you have a back_move_inserter, you 
need a container that has move-capabilities. I adapted Interprocess ones 
to test the Move library.

> I completly agree. What about requesting a formal review?

If there is some consensus, no problem. But I really want to avoid long 
and time-consuming review (and boost reviews require a very big effort, 
just see the ratio of announced/accepted libraries ;-) ), because my 
time is quite limited right now. That's why I wanted to get some serious 
feedback.

Regards,

Ion