Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review Request: Boost.String.Convert
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-18 22:49:33
Andrey Semashev wrote:
> My current vision is that Boost.NumericConversion and Boost.Units will
> provide a support layer for Boost.Convert (let's call it that way for
> now). That support layer will be implemented as a regular extension
> for the Boost.Convert library. So, the "convert" function will
> eventually call numeric_cast or quantity_cast, or any other
> appropriate tool in these libraries to fulfill the conversion.
There is no function called quantity_cast, in the released version of
Boost.Units--it's spelled static_cast.
The problem with a fully generic convert is that it's a different beast
from string conversions. Converting
to and from a string can require formatting information that is
meaningless for other conversions and
which cannot easily be provided by fully generic code.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk