Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review Request: Boost.String.Convert
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-19 13:21:45
Steven Watanabe wrote:
> Andrey Semashev wrote:
>> My current vision is that Boost.NumericConversion and Boost.Units will
>> provide a support layer for Boost.Convert (let's call it that way for
>> now). That support layer will be implemented as a regular extension
>> for the Boost.Convert library. So, the "convert" function will
>> eventually call numeric_cast or quantity_cast, or any other
>> appropriate tool in these libraries to fulfill the conversion.
> There is no function called quantity_cast, in the released version of
> Boost.Units--it's spelled static_cast.
Huh? I can see it in the library docs:
> The problem with a fully generic convert is that it's a different beast
> from string conversions. Converting
> to and from a string can require formatting information that is
> meaningless for other conversions and
> which cannot easily be provided by fully generic code.
This is where tools like Boost.Parameter could come forward.
String-related conversions may not be the only domain where passing
arbitrary parameters to the conversion mechanism is desirable.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk