Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: [boost] [c++0x] OK to merge cpp0x branch config changes to trunk?
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-21 09:43:06


See http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/branches/cpp0x

This branch adds the following config macros:

BOOST_NO_CHAR16_T
BOOST_NO_CHAR32_T
BOOST_NO_CONSTEXPR
BOOST_NO_DECLTYPE
BOOST_NO_DEFAULTED_FUNCTIONS
BOOST_NO_DELETED_FUNCTIONS
BOOST_NO_EXPLICIT_CONVERSION_OPERATORS
BOOST_NO_EXTERN_TEMPLATE
BOOST_NO_RAW_LITERALS
BOOST_NO_RVALUE_REFERENCES
BOOST_NO_SCOPED_ENUMS
BOOST_NO_STATIC_ASSERT
BOOST_NO_UNICODE_LITERALS
BOOST_NO_VARIADIC_TEMPLATES

The particular names were discussed in several threads nearly a year ago.

The set of C++0x features detected only covers those available in at
least one shipping compiler.

Although I've tested locally, I'd appreciate it if someone familiar with
Boost.Config could take a look at the branch before the config
directories get merged into trunk.

--Beman


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk