Subject: Re: [boost] [utility] new auto_buffer class --- RFC
From: Amit (contact.lipik_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-02 10:17:29
I think this would be very useful, in almost all applications.
I had a quick look at the code. Just one comment: there appears to be no reason
for the copy[_rai]() functions to me non-static members - it will just create
code bloat when auto_buffer<>s are created with different N.
Am I missing something, or would it make sense into a private namespace?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk