Re: [boost] Formal Review: Boost.RangeEx

Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review: Boost.RangeEx
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-02 10:18:13

on Fri Feb 27 2009, Giovanni Piero Deretta <gpderetta-AT-gmail.com> wrote:

>> Â rng && rng2 | transformed(binary_fun())
>
> you mean for the two ranges variant of transform?
>
> Well first you can always do this:
>
>   zip(rng, rng2) | transformed (unpack(binary_fun())

    zip(rng, rng2) | transform( unzip_args(binary_fun) )

> obviating the need for a 2 range (or n-range) variant at all.
> Otherwise, may be an infix syntax would work (but it probably count as
> too much operator abuse [1]):
>
>  rng1 ^transformed(binary_fun())^ rng2  ;

I'm sorry, I can't understand that one.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com