Re: [boost] [SPAM (Bayesian)] - Re: Formal Review: Boost.RangeEx - Bayesian Filter detected spam

Subject: Re: [boost] [SPAM (Bayesian)] - Re: Formal Review: Boost.RangeEx - Bayesian Filter detected spam
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-02 10:23:24

on Mon Mar 02 2009, Arno Schödl <aschoedl-AT-think-cell.com> wrote:

>> One doesn't usually combine lazy and immediate algorithms, right, no?
>> I think I'd rather see something like:
>>
>>      {
>>        using range_ex::transform; // immediate
>>        transform(s, f);
>>      }
>>
>>      {
>>        using range_ex::view::transform;
>>        transform(s, f);
>>      }
>
> I think lazy algorithms should be different in non-qualified name from the eager ones,
> so that dumb text searches work and casually glancing at the code tells the right
> story.

  s = s | transform(f)

vs

  transform(s, f, s)

I think the difference is quite obvious and the syntax needs no elaboration.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com