Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [thread] performance of thread-local storage implementation
From: Edouard A. (edouard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-11 14:24:48

> My interpretation of the results is, that using thread-local storage is
> quite expensive. This was somehow expected. But what's surprising is,
> that the boost lib introduces an other penalty of factor 5.5.

Hi Alexander,

Have you run this benchmark in Windows? I would be very much interested in
the results.

Kind regards.



Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at