Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Lite Version
From: Jean-Sebastien Stoezel (js.stoezel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-13 17:52:47
As I said in my email, it would be 30% of a couple hundreds kbytes of
ROM and 30% of a couple dozens of RAM.
To give you an example, lately I have been using FreeRTOS. This RTOS
is not POSIX and not supported by Boost. However I would like my
applications to be able to start a FreeRTOS taks using the thread
library. Same with semaphores.
On 13-Mar-09, at 8:46 AM, Vicente Botet Escriba wrote:
> Jean-Sebastien stoezel wrote:
>> I have been using Boot for desktop applications and I'm very happy
>> with it. It allows me to write portable and reusable code on all the
>> platforms I've been supporting.
>> I also develop C++ applications for small embedded devices, that have
>> very limited ROM and RAM capabilities (several hundreds of kilo bytes
>> of ROM and dozens of kilobytes of RAM). The Boost libraries cannot be
>> used as is for these devices, since the OSes (RTOS I should say) that
>> run on these devices are not supported by Boost. Then my code for
>> these devices is not as portable and reusable as I which it would be.
>> I've developed my own accross-platform generic interface for these
>> devices and it's starting to look like Boost... Except it's not Boost
>> and it's still very proprietary, in the niche sense.
>> I am very interested in having a (real) lite version of Boost for
>> these embedded devices, even if it only consists of stub functions.
>> Is there already an on going effort to do this? Again, the idea is a
>> lite version, something that would fit in less than 30% of the memory
>> of a microcontroller.
>> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> I would like to have some clarifications.
> Most of the boost libraries are header only; Is it about the size of
> static/shared compiled libraries you are tallking?
> How many 30% of the memory of a microcontroller represents? What is
> the size
> of the libraries you need?
> Could you state what do you need that it is not portable on your
> I don't know what can be done with a lite version (with stubs),
> could you
> Have you tried to port the parts of Boost you need and don't work on
> I think most of the concerned authors will apreciate a patch?
> Best regards,
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Boost-Lite-Version-tp22496134p22496717.html
> Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk