Re: [boost] Default variants on windows

Subject: Re: [boost] Default variants on windows
From: Hansi (hansipet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-04-08 09:20:42

Vladimir Prus schrieb:
> Per:
> 
> 	https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/2899
> 
> we have a problem that the default set of libraries
> build on Windows does not match autolink defaults, which
> causes confusion. In that issue, John say that the only
> sensible solution for Windows is to build all possible
> variants by default (IIRC, a total of 6). I would like
> other Windows developers to comment if that is sensible
> solution. In particular, is it best to build all possible
> variants that user might need, or build just the variants
> that autolink needs by default, so that user can build other
> later.
> 
> Note that I can add arbitrary explanation messages into
> the build process -- both to warn the user that a scary
> pile of things will be built, and to warn the user that only
> couple of variants will be built.
> 
> - Volodya

I think it is needed also SCL_SECURE variant! it is really important...