Subject: Re: [boost] discussion of garbage collection in C++
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-04-25 02:09:46
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Raindog <raindog_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Mathias Gaunard wrote:
>> Simonson, Lucanus J wrote:
>> Why stop half way? Why not have an open source C++ runtime environment if
>> the goal is applications programming and rapid prototyping in C++ with open
>> source components? An open source GC library is a good building block for
>> such a system, and of course we'd prefer to implement it in C++.
>> Why build a runtime environment based on GC when you can make a better one
>> that is not?
> Because the majority of programmers have proven that they obviously prefer a
> GC environment over an RAII one.
So they can use a GC environment -- there are plenty of them to choose
from. Somehow, C++ (and C) prevail and remain popular without GC. :)
Reverge Studios, Inc.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk