Subject: Re: [boost] Review Request: Algorithm.Sorting
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-04-30 14:37:11
Steven Ross wrote:
> I have figured out an optimization that in simple testing makes integer_sort
> faster than std::sort on already-sorted data (and comparable on
> mostly-sorted data), and improves performance slightly on unsorted data. As
> the worse best-case performance was the main drawback to the algorithm based
> upon my prior results, I was wondering if it was appropriate to delay the
> review until I can get this change fully implemented and tested?
> If it is proper to delay the review, I apologize for wasting people's time.
> I thought I was done optimizing it, but apparently not.
> I think I can finish all this up by monday
It usually takes a fair amount of time to schedule a review.
There shouldn't be any problem.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk