Subject: Re: [boost] trunk vs release
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-21 12:17:44
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Stefan Seefeld <seefeld_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Robert Ramey wrote:
>> This discussion demonstrates what's wrong with the current testing of the
>> Here is the way it should be done.
>> For each library that is changed, the library version on the trunk should
>> be tested against
>> the release branch.
> I fully agree. This requires boost to become modular, with dependencies
> between libraries properly being tracked and cared for, such that such an
> arrangement becomes possible. (There are many more advantages to a modular
> boost, which I won't repeat here, as we have had such discussions multiple
> times in the past, never getting anywhere.)
There was a lot of discussion of modularization at BoostCon. Several
of us have volunteered our libraries as guinea pigs once the
mechanisms are in place.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk