Subject: Re: [boost] trunk vs release
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-22 13:41:46
Robert Ramey wrote:
> troy d. straszheim wrote:
>> Robert Ramey wrote:
>>> It's a lot simpler than
>>> trying to maintain
>>> and "customize" a "global view" with an array of command line
>>> options and doesn't
>>> require any more work to make the libraries "more modular".
>> What are you referring to?
> The current boost build/bjam has some switches like "exclude serialization"
> something like that. My way of doing things eliminates the need for
It does not. Those options have nothing to do with testing, and don't
affect what libraries are tested and not. They are exclusively for
controlling what is built and installed.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk