Re: [boost] trunk vs release (qtsync implementation)

Subject: Re: [boost] trunk vs release (qtsync implementation)
From: troy d. straszheim (troy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-28 05:46:30

Ilya Sokolov wrote:
> troy d. straszheim wrote:
>> 1. if you add or remove headers you'd have to rerun this script.
>>
>> 2. there's an extra #include hop in every error/warning.  We could 
>> probably do something with links on unix to get around this.
>>
>> 3. it requires python
> 
> It should be possible (in bbv2, at least) to add a build system target 
> to overcome these limitations, isn't it?

Sounds reasonable to me.

-t