Subject: Re: [boost] [task] - boost.task (replacement for boost.threadpool)
From: Sohail Somani (sohail_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-01 17:34:22
> Am Montag 01 Juni 2009 21:11:17 schrieb Sohail Somani:
>> It seems the only real difference is a future/handle which the above
>> library also has in an experimental capacity.
> AFAIK - the implementation from http://threadpool.sf.net doesn't provide a
> working future implementation nor does is implement work-stealing (including
> sub-tasking) or task interruption.
> Boost.Task provides this functionality (it uses the future implementation from
> Anthony Williams which will be part of boost soon).
Ah, thanks for clarifying. I think your statements are correct.
Is boost.task being used in production yet?
-- Sohail Somani http://uint32t.blogspot.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk