Subject: Re: [boost] Change to documentation writing guidelines
From: Daniel James (daniel_james_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-03 19:06:01
2009/6/1 Stewart, Robert <Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden]>:
> The introduction is not a good place to document content requirements. I suggest something like the following:
Yeah, you're probably right. I was trying to change as little as
possible but what your version works well. I've added it here:
I thought that your second paragraph seemed to mainly apply to the
first section of the document, so I moved it into that section, and
tried to give a slightly better idea of how it relates to the next
section. I also put back in the section of the standard that it's
taken from as I think that's important.
Does that seem sensible?
Any other suggestions are very welcome. The lasted version in trunk
can be seen at:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk