Subject: Re: [boost] Change to documentation writing guidelines
From: Daniel James (daniel_james_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-03 19:11:12
2009/6/3 David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]>:
> I'm afraid to say this, because I know some of my older libraries don't
> conform to the guidelines at all, but...
> I think we've developed enough guidelines that it would be a good idea
> for _someone_ (ahem!) to go through the docs and create tickets for all
> the places where our existing documentation doesn't conform. That would
> at least give lib maintainers an opportunity to face the question of
> whether they're going to make the fix. :-)
Maybe, but the guidelines repeatedly make the point that they're not
compulsory so I've always seen them as optional.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk