Subject: Re: [boost] boost::directx?
From: Christian Schladetsch (christian.schladetsch_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-07 09:42:17
> The few others left - boost.mpi and boost.python come to mind, are unlikely
> to ever make their way into the C++ standard, I agree, but they are at least
> portable and wrap non-proprietary interfaces.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk