Subject: Re: [boost] boost::directx?
From: Gevorg Voskanyan (v_gevorg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-07 10:20:45
Christian Schladetsch wrote:
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2009 6:42:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [boost] boost::directx?
> > The few others left - boost.mpi and boost.python come to mind, are unlikely
> > to ever make their way into the C++ standard, I agree, but they are at least
> > portable and wrap non-proprietary interfaces.
The reply came empty. Could you please resend the content?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk