Subject: Re: [boost] boost::directx?
From: Christian Schladetsch (christian.schladetsch_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-07 10:32:19
> > > The few others left - boost.mpi and boost.python come to mind, are
> > > to ever make their way into the C++ standard, I agree, but they are at
> > > portable and wrap non-proprietary interfaces.
> > >
> > Christian
> The reply came empty. Could you please resend the content?
My reply was intentionallly empty. There is nothing to say in that face.
> Gevorgly emt
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk