Subject: Re: [boost] boost::directx?
From: Kasra (kasra_n500_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-08 06:29:52
I have been following this thread but haven't really found the significance of boost::directx!
If the purpose of the library is to create a comprehensive graphics library, choosing directx or infact any other API seems absurd.
For example, ORGE is a graphics library that doesn't choose OpenGL over DirecX but provides a wrapping interface for a graphics library where this library's internal is OpenGL and DirectX depending on the platform.
I just think if this library is going to established within boost, it requires a portable interface irrespective of the internals.
With Best Regards
--- Kasra Nassiri
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk