Subject: Re: [boost] boost::directx?
From: Christian Schladetsch (christian.schladetsch_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-09 05:15:59
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Carlos Rafael Giani <
> joel wrote:
>> Make this some kind of boost::graphics, target both dx and ogl or w/e in a
>> seamless fashion, then you have something worthy.
> This is commonly found in 3D graphics engines. However, a low level ogl/dx
> abstraction is time-consuming, and ultimately not worth it, because both
> APIs, while roughly equal, differ in many details, which sums up in a
> low-level abstraction that covers the lowest common denominator. It is
> better to abstract in a higher semantic level, however this is hard to
> accomplish as a general 3D rendering library (and probably not very useful,
> since rendering applications vary wildly in their feature requirements and
> applied techniques).
I have repeatedly stated my belief that it is futile, if not insane, to
attempt to make a system that uses either DirectX or OpenGL.
That is the reason that I explicitly suggested boost::directx, rather than
> In short, even then we don't even have something useful for boost.
Perhaps. I only wished to raise the issue and provide some demo code. What
happens after that is up to the boost community.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk