Subject: Re: [boost] boost::directx?
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-09 07:44:22
Daniel James skrev:
> 2009/6/9 Christian Schladetsch <christian.schladetsch_at_[hidden]>:
>> This thread suggests that a DirectX wrapper
>>> would be rejected.
>> I have gone to great lengths to make clear that I am not proposing a
>> "DirectX wrapper".
>> Providing systems that support DirectX development is a different thing to
>> making a system that wraps DirectX.
> OK. This thread suggests that a 'system that supports DirectX
> development' would be rejected.
How many of those with negative comments are actually using direct x?
I personally think it would be a ice addition to boost, if it adds true
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk