Subject: Re: [boost] boost::directx?
From: Daniel James (daniel_james_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-09 05:41:33
2009/6/9 Christian Schladetsch <christian.schladetsch_at_[hidden]>:
> This thread suggests that a DirectX wrapper
>> would be rejected.
> I have gone to great lengths to make clear that I am not proposing a
> "DirectX wrapper".
> Providing systems that support DirectX development is a different thing to
> making a system that wraps DirectX.
OK. This thread suggests that a 'system that supports DirectX
development' would be rejected.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk