Subject: Re: [boost] boost::directx?
From: Christian Schladetsch (christian.schladetsch_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-09 10:39:34
All we are saying is that your information that Spirit
> does not have ASTs and does not support string templates is wrong.
While I am not making friends, it is also misleading to suggest that Spirit
"supports StringTemplates". It doesn't; it doesn't have an interpreter.
And it's support for "AST" is arguable at least; those that can understand
and use AST as proposed by Spirit is reduced to you, it's creator and maybe
1 or 2 others. In any case, the errors it produces are largely meaningless.
That actually means something to real people.
I am well argued in the area of just because you can, doesnt mean you
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk