Re: [boost] version conflicts: is there a solution?

Subject: Re: [boost] version conflicts: is there a solution?
From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-25 10:27:07

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 25 June 2009, Frank Mori Hess wrote:
> On Thursday 25 June 2009, Edward Diener wrote:
> > > Can you point to anything in the standard that supports your position?
> >
> > Where in the standard do you see any mention of an ODR violation
> > occuring where there are no header files being distributed for inclusion
> > by a source file which would create such a violation ?
>
> There is the 3rd paragraph of the "one definition rule" section:

Err, actually that doesn't apply to header-only stuff.  But going back to 
section I mentioned originally, there is 3.2.5 which covers multiple 
definitions in different translation units.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkpDiTsACgkQ5vihyNWuA4U4vgCgzYte35HPcd/DtSxOgFUqTycw
PqAAnj5ffxZPro7BZqTeRb0jt/09ZYog
=Jm2k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----