Re: [boost] [convert] Now with Boost.Parameter interface.

Subject: Re: [boost] [convert] Now with Boost.Parameter interface.
From: Gottlob Frege (gottlobfrege_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-07-02 12:55:07

On Thursday, July 2, 2009, Scott McMurray <me22.ca+boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 2009/7/2 Stewart, Robert <Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden]>:
>>
>> Why not with the syntax Dave has been suggesting:
>>
>>   converter<int>(locale_ = loc, throw_ = true).from(str, 0);
>>
>
> To me, that's the nicest one yet proposed.
>

I think that the only complaint was that it limits the number of
params, whereas the other version does not. But if you have more than
10 params, I think you have bigger problems.

> And it'd be quite reasonable, instead of statics, to just use

I didn't see that as a static, but as a constructor call.

> convert<int>().from(str, 0), since that's already common from function
> objects.
>
> And actually, why not spell from() as operator(), so it can be a
> proper function object?
>
> transform( istream_iterator<string>(cin), istream_iterator<string>(),
> back_inserter(v), convert<int>(locale_ = loc, base_ = 16, throw_ =
> false, default_ = 0));
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost