Subject: Re: [boost] [xpressive] Performance Tuning?
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-07-17 19:51:06
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:10 PM, <raindog_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I would be very interested in seeing this too as your numbers look extremely good
> As stated, the numbers are basically hogwash until all three forms are
> all tested on the same hardware using the same compiler. I *might*
> have time tonight to work on the code that the others posted above to
> get it compilable, although it is rather irritating that they posted
> code that was incomplete, but meh. If I have time tonight then I can
> test all three versions using MSVC8 on WinXP on my old 1.8ghz Opteron
> Who knows, one of the other version may still be faster, MSVC does
> tend to handle optimizing heavy templated code better then other
> compilers, and Spirit is nothing but basically to be inlined templated
> code, so it might be able to optimize the xpressive version better as
> well, and who knows how it will handle the original code.
I thought Rob posted his code as an attachment here:
Is that not complete?
-- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk