Subject: Re: [boost] Dereferencing End Iterators (Was: Performance Tuning?)
From: Christopher Jefferson (chris_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-07-22 13:02:55
On 22 Jul 2009, at 16:23, Stewart, Robert wrote:
>> Ultimately are random access iterators *supposed* to be homeomorphic
>> to the integers in the same (apparent) way C indices are?
I'm sure that:
int* b = a + 4;
Is illegal C code, as you have gone outside the bounds of your array,
even if you never dereference the pointer.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk