Re: [boost] [function] should it require rtti?

Subject: Re: [boost] [function] should it require rtti?
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-07-23 14:39:26

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Doug Gregor<doug.gregor_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Emil
> Dotchevski<emil_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Line 223 in function_base.hpp uses typeid. Can this be avoided? If
>> not, perhaps it can be refactored to use the workaround found in
>> sp_typeinfo.hpp?
>
> Function needs to work when RTTI is not available. It's acceptable for
> some functionality to be missing (contains/target/target_type) or to
> implement the same functionality in a different way.

Well then this should be fixed.

Emil Dotchevski
Reverge Studios, Inc.
http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode