Subject: Re: [boost] [1.40.0] Beta 1 release candidate available
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-12 06:17:32
>> This is because he's asked for runtime-link=static in combination with
>> In that case the targets that depend upon that "impossible" combination
>> should not be built, but everything else should be?
> Hmm, isn't it just boost.regex? Or there are other targets that depend on
> that? Do you want some diagnostic, or silent skipping?
Yes I believe it's just regex in this case (unless there are any other
libraries that depend upon external C++ .so's?), a warning to the effect
that one particular combination can't be built would be fine. If this can
be fixed easily in the regex Jamfile then that's fine too.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk