Subject: Re: [boost] different matrix library?
From: DE (satan66613_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-14 14:21:53
on 14.08.2009 at 22:05
joel wrote :
>> still what about small dynamically alocated entities? i like them very
>> much! i'm afraid about bad performance of the
> You mean like 4x4 matrix ?
> In this case, I use static allcoation and guess what :
> boost::array< boost::array<T,4>, 4 >
> acts with the same interface and leads to proper code generation later on.
> Just specialize when you know your size at CT.
you might be right
i just thought 'why i need arbitrary size _matrix_?' it might turn
out there is no such cases
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk