Subject: Re: [boost] different matrix library?
From: joel (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-14 14:34:03
> you might be right. i just thought 'why i need arbitrary size
> _matrix_?' it might turn out there is no such cases
There is. Small matrix like rotation matrix or 3D vector can benefit
from a total unrolling of their evaluation.
Knowing size of matrix at compile-time opens for a lot of such
optimization (tiling, prefethcing, unrolling, strip mining)
that make such a library able to compete with hand written C.
-- ___________________________________________ Joel Falcou - Assistant Professor PARALL Team - LRI - Universite Paris Sud XI Tel : (+33)1 69 15 66 35
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk