Subject: Re: [boost] different matrix library?
From: joel (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-17 12:58:13
> matrix<double> m(3, 3); //dynamically allocated
> matrix<double, 3, 3> static_m; //statically allocated
I was speaking of the expression class. I also advice you to not
multiply tempalte parameters like that as it quickly becomes
hard to maintain.
> again, my point is: since you need to implement policies themselves
> somewhere and their relationship and behavor (possibly by specializing
> some templates) why not to do that by defining distinct types with
> proper interfaces?
Because you'll need a combinatorial number of such thing.
> it's a very simple,
> easily maintainable design
> and more: it is easier to understand for users
Not more than my solution.
-- ___________________________________________ Joel Falcou - Assistant Professor PARALL Team - LRI - Universite Paris Sud XI Tel : (+33)1 69 15 66 35
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk