Re: [boost] different matrix library?

Subject: Re: [boost] different matrix library?
From: joel (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-17 12:58:13

DE wrote:
> matrix<double> m(3, 3); //dynamically allocated
> matrix<double, 3, 3> static_m; //statically allocated
I was speaking of the expression class. I also advice you to not 
multiply tempalte parameters like that as it quickly becomes
hard to maintain.

> again, my point is: since you need to implement policies themselves
> somewhere and their relationship and behavor (possibly by specializing
> some templates) why not to do that by defining distinct types with
> proper interfaces?
>   
Because you'll need a combinatorial number of such thing.

> it's a very simple, 
Yes
> stable, 
Yes
> scalable
No
>  easily maintainable design
>   
No
> and more: it is easier to understand for users
>   
Not more than my solution.

-- 
___________________________________________
Joel Falcou - Assistant Professor
PARALL Team - LRI - Universite Paris Sud XI
Tel : [phone]