Subject: Re: [boost] different matrix library?
From: DE (satan66613_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-18 12:23:38
on 18.08.2009 at 20:16
joel wrote :
>> you might be right (actually i have no chance to prove the contrary)
> I have a small test code I'm trying to find atm to post.
>> so why not compute indeces for 2d case and use nrc for N>2?
>> i think it's trivial to implement
> Because the loss is so marginal in large computation that I prefer
> havign an homogeneous allcoation/acces schema.
however there can be benefits (space and time) for small 2d matrices
(wich i consider will be a widespread case)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk